On Fri 2016-01-15 10:34:51, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Am 13.01.2016 um 20:15 schrieb Mark Rutland <[email protected]>: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:28:00PM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > >> Hi Tomeu, > >> > >> Am 12.01.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> On 11 May 2015 at 03:56, NeilBrown <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> here is version 4 of my "UART slave device" patch set, previously > >>>> known as "tty slave devices". > >>> > >>> Hi Neil, > >>> > >>> do you (or someone else) have plans to continue this work in the short > >>> or medium term? > >> > >> yes, there is something in our upstreaming pipeline. This one works for us > >> on top of 4.4.0: > >> > >> <http://git.goldelico.com/?p=gta04-kernel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/work/hns/misc/w2sg-tty-slave2-v4> > >> > >> There is one point still to be solved: the exact style of the DT bindings. > >> > >> We have an idea how a driver can implement two different styles (child > >> node AND phandle) > >> so that it is up to the DTS developer to use the one that best fits into > >> the existing DTS. > > > > From my perspective as a binding maintainer, and as I stated before, the > > child node approach made the most sense and was most consistent with the > > > way we handle other devices. > > I simply don't see that this is the most common way other devices > are handled.
You promised to shut up once maintainers speak, that happened, and you did not shut up. Just do it now. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ Gta04-owner mailing list [email protected] http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/gta04-owner
