For this, we should choose a maintainer. I'll try to read though the documentation in the next few days and list on the bug (https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gtg/+bug/520171) the actions that we should take. Never surrender.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Luca Invernizzi <[email protected]>wrote: > Sure! > > - We are famous enough > - We have GNOME in the name of the project > - tasque and tomboy is in there http://l10n.gnome.org/module/ which are > very similar (ahem..) to us. > - we may attract some developer > > What are the cons to this? I can list one: > - bureaucracy to get in > > ps: I've already reported a similar bug > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gtg/+bug/520171 > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Lionel Dricot <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2010/02/17/gnome-3-0-module-proposals-welcome-now/ >> >> Do you think that GTG should be proposed as a GNOME 3 module ? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
