On 8/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:46:43AM -0500, Matt Hoosier wrote: > > On 8/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:21:26AM -0500, Matt Hoosier wrote: > [...] > > Yes, understood. It would be nice to avoid the expansion until actual > > use, so that the process's address space isn't inflated for images > > that are only occassionally used. > > Hmm. But when expanding, you'd end up with double (well 1 + 5/8) the > inflation of address space, since you get to keep the compressed image > around (of course, if it is cleverly done, the MM would know that the > compressed part is read-only and thus discardable from physical memory). > > > There's also the consideration the > > the binary's disk footprint grows, which is significant when dealing > > with embedded apps. > > Seems you'll have to do the png decoding yourself :-(
Yes, I suspected this from the outset too. Thanks for the comments. > > regards > -- tomás > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFE11jqBcgs9XrR2kYRAvmBAJ4jzNI9X4CDwAA0+nhisZXlJX9kCACdEuUk > hlrcJtRwYKaBrioljJhUCn0= > =uk8Q > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
