2008/10/21 Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > But I admit I don't have any *really* strong preference. If it really > is so that the majority of people who distribute GTK+ apps on Windows > would prefer that the pixbuf loaders were separate DLLs I can return > to that. Is there anybody out there who prefers having built-in > loaders?
I think I prefer separate loaders, if I understand the trade-offs correctly. The app I package and distribute needs tiff/jpeg load and save, so having an extra copy of the libraries statically linked in to the gtk stack bulks up my zip unnecessarily. My app also includes libMagick, so I think I might have three copies of libtiff and libjpeg in my download at the moment, annoyingly. John _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
