Jeffrey Barish wrote: > Is there a reason to block/unblock a handler rather than disconnect/connect > it? Is the overhead for block/unblock significantly lower?
Off the top of my head I can think of one: block/unblock will certainly not change handler order, while disconnect/connect may. Overhead must not be significant unless you are doing it say 10000 times a second. > One thing I don't like about block/unblock is that GTK issues a warning when > you try to unblock a handler that is not blocked, but there is no way to > ask first whether the handler is currently blocked. disconnect/connect > offers the handler_is_connected query. It seems g_signal_handler_find() could be misused for this, though in any way this will be ugly. Paul _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
