Incorrect, The ISO C standard defines the & operator on a function name to be optional when taking asking for a function pointer, I just use it as a habit of style.
Here's a demonstration of this effect: http://www.rutski89.com/static/funcptr.txt I still need help with the ->event GTK problem. -Patrick On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Brian J. Tarricone<bj...@cornell.edu> wrote: > On 08/20/2009 05:36 PM, Patrick M. Rutkowski wrote: >> I've got the following code: http://www.rutski89.com/static/gtkevent.cpp >> >> I do indeed do this: >> >> widget_class->event = &any_event_r >> >> but then any_event_r() never subsequently get's called, and I'm >> certain that the "widget_class->event = &any_event_r" line really does >> execute. >> >> Any suggestions? > > You're setting ->event to a pointer to a pointer to a function when all > it wants is a pointer to a function. > > -brian > _______________________________________________ > gtk-app-devel-list mailing list > gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list > _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
