On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 16:26 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote: > I'll leave the final patch up to you; I really don't care a lot > about naming inside the Win32 backend. But I would suggest you > compare the handling of the Cairo surface in the two patches; > I think what I'm doing will work better in the short term, and > is more amenable to improvement with future additions to Cairo.
I committed a big change yesterday to make GTK+/GDK use Cairo
for much of it's drawing. So, we need to get something in to
keep the win32 port running. Unless I hear otherwise, what I'll
do is fix up my patch for some changes I made in the GDK backend
interface and commit that.
Regards,
Owen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
