On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 01:07:51PM -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 13:46 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Are these ones going to be blocking calls, or do they > > return a partial result?
They will certainly not be blocking of course ;) > The idea is to remove gtk_file_folder_get_info() and add a toplevel > gtk_file_system_get_info (fs, path, callback) (right, Kris?). We are indeed going to add a toplevel gtk_file_system_get_info(), I was not thinking of removing gtk_file_folder_get_info() though. Does it make sense to remove it? I don't think leaving it were it is now will hurt anything. > Kris also had plans for folder_list_children(); it doesn't make much > sense to call it until the folder in question has emitted the > "finished-loading" signal. The idea is that you get the requested GtkFileFolder via a callback, then you will be notified of any newly added files via the "files-added" signal. My plan was to have folder_list_children() return a partial result here. Until "finished-loading" is received, then folder_list_children() can return a list of children of the entire folder. -kris. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
