On Thu, December 1, 2005 13:10, Vincent Untz wrote: > [I'm not sure why I didn't cc gtk-devel-list in my previous mail, so > doing it right now]
And really doing it now. > On Thu, December 1, 2005 13:01, Murray Cumming wrote: >> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 12:58 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: >>> On Thu, December 1, 2005 11:05, Murray Cumming wrote: >>> > Can the release-team please confirm the glib and pango versions that >>> will >>> > be in GNOME 2.14? It looks like there will be a glib 2.10 and pango >>> 2.10 >>> > in time for our schedule, but not a GTK+ 2.10. >>> >>> If the schedule of glib 2.10 and pango 1.12 (I think this is the >>> version >>> you're wondering about) is compatible with ours, then I see no reason >>> to not use them. >>> >>> I can't find a release schedule for glib & pango, though (although >>> Matthias sent a mail on d-d-l telling he wanted this to happen, >>> iirc). >> >> We need to establish this to >> - avoid use of new API if we might not use them. >> - tell bindings to wrap them if we definitely will use them. > > Indeed. I don't think a lot of people are using glib 2.9 or pango 1.11 > right now (so I don't expect the first item to be a problem right now), > but the second item is important. > > glib/pango people: do you have an idea of the release date for glib > 2.10.0 and pango 1.12.0? > > Vincent > > -- > Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. > Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list