On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I'm going to modularize the fat pango package - split it > > > into separate packages, one per module. > > > > If Pango is fat, what is Firefox or OpenOffice.org then? :) > > Even fatter ?
What do you mean really? You should be joking. Have you even looked at the Pango source code? > > How do you want to split it into separate packages? That's > > really a packaging issue best dealt with distros. > > Well, I actually dont have any distro. I'm building evrything > from scratch up. > > The problem is: > > I need to configure my systems as small as possible. Okay, I could > throw out evrything I think I don't need. But how to I know what > is really needed ? If we've split it into separate modules, then > the buildsystem will know - a simple pkg-config query would be > enough for most cases. So what? You can disable all modules during compilation. And even if your argument was valid, there are too many more people that prefer Pango as a single package. There's not much reason to continue this thread really. > cu --behdad http://behdad.org/ "Commandment Three says Do Not Kill, Amendment Two says Blood Will Spill" -- Dan Bern, "New American Language" _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list