I wrote: > - Can the support for Win9x be dropped from GLib and GTK+ HEAD? Note > that cairo has never worked on Win9x, so GTK+ has de facto not worked > on Win9x since 2.8 anyway.
OK, there seemes to be no major opposition to this, being done now. > - Can the support for 256-colour (palettized) display mode be dropped > from GTK+ HEAD? I'm not doing this, not yet at least. If I can figure out a way to test whether 256-colour mode works currently, and it doesn't, I will drop it though... > - Can support for the ActiveIMM thingie used to implement IMEs on NT4 > (and Win9x) be dropped? I am doing this, too. > - Can Uniscribe be made non-optional in pangowin32? I am not sure about this yet. It should be self-evident that a production build of Pango should use Uniscribe. But maybe it is a good idea to continue letting people who want to debug or developer Pango on Win32, and can't be bothered to download the Platform SDK, build it without Uniscribe, though. --tml _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
