Michael Urman wrote: > On 10/25/06, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - GLib based test programs should never produce a "CRITICAL **:" or >> "WARNING **:" message and succeed. > > It would be good not to make it impossible to test WARNINGs and > CRITICALs. After all, error cases are often the least tested part of > an application, so it's important to make sure the base library > detects and handles the error cases correctly. >
Testing those is like testing segfault handling, i.e. just nuts. The behavior is undefined once they print. (Well, for critical anyway. g_warning seems to be less consistently used) Havoc _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
