muppet wrote: Just including the list in the reply.
> On May 28, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Martyn Russell wrote: >> Architecture >> >> GTK+ is based on three libraries ... >> >> * Glib ... >> * Pango ... >> * Cairo ... >> * ATK ... > > Makes me think, "Our chief weapon is fear. And surprise. Surprise and > fear. Our two main weapons are fear and surprise. And ruthless > efficiency. ..." :-) Woa, good catch :) I added Cairo after that's how that happened. > Under Language Bindings on the same page, i believe that gtk2-perl has > had full support for 2.0 and 2.2 for quite some time now. Yea, again, the content here is quite important to me, the information I used from the old pages may have been grossly out of date in places. Thanks, I will update accordingly. > As a frequent user of the docs on the website, a long-time pet peeve has > been that the table of API reference docs uses the same text for all of > the links. (online, online, online at http://gtk.org/api/, and View, > View, View, View in your new one.) That makes it rather hard to jump > straight to a link when driving with the keyboard. Yea, I agree actually, I couldn't think of a much better way of doing it to be honest. Suggestions are welcome :) > This brings up another point; i know there are a *lot* of pointers on > the web to gtk.org urls like http://gtk.org/api/ and > http://gtk.org/tutorial/ ... Your new site doesn't have a /api, and > instead puts everything into /documentation.html. Any thoughts about > backward compat for the links and structure of the old site? Yes, I plan to include some redirections there. There are some other backward compatible issues which the new pages don't show up which we would need to have, such as: - http://gtk.org/setuid.html - http://www.gtk.org/api/2.6 These are the links which I gathered from my initial posting which need to be sustained. If there are any others people have in mind, let me know. >> * What are people's thoughts on the initial look and feel? > > It's rather more spartan than i expected. I do like low-bandwidth web > sites, but a bit more color wouldn't hurt. Also, gray-on-white text has > low contrast, and gets hard on the eyes. Hmm, OK, I will create another design and see what people think, perhaps one with: - Black text - Blue selection headings (instead of Red) - Some more colour in other places, perhaps for headers. > I hate to break it to you, but magic data pixies don't exist. So the rumours aren't true? :P -- Regards, Martyn _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
