Le lundi 28 mai 2007, à 19:05 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit : > On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 16:12 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Since the release dates for GTK+ 2.12 and glib 2.14 are now post-GUADEC > > and it's probably not a good idea to put pressure on the GTK+ team, I > > believe it's better to stay with GTK+ 2.10/glib 2.12 for GNOME 2.20. > > > > If there's no objection, the release team will announce this in a few > > days. > > If this happens, I hope that GTK+ will not then be frozen before GNOME > 2.21/2.22 development has really started, or else the new GTK+ API will > be frozen before it is tested. Synchronization with the GNOME release > schedule would be best.
Well, I obviously can't speak about GTK+ plans. But here's what I believe is the current status: + GNOME: if GTK+ 2.12 is not out before the end of July, then it's not reasonable to depend on it for GNOME 2.20. While the goal of the GTK+ team seems compatible, there's currently no hard guarantee that GTK+ 2.12 will be released as planned. + GTK+: GTK+ 2.12 is already late, and waiting for the next GNOME unstable development cycle might not be reasonable either. Waiting for GNOME 2.21 means delaying 2.12 for at least 3 months. Like everybody, I can't wait to use GTK+ 2.12 in GNOME. I'd even be okay to push for this happening soon, and I'd be ready to annoy GTK+ developers to get the new GTK+ out in time :-) But I don't want the first 2.12 releases to be buggy because they were rushed. I'd love to hear what's the best option for GTK+. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list