On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 15:32 +0100, Damon Chaplin wrote: > > I think its quite important here to not repeat one of the > > the most obvious mistakes of glade/libglade, swapping the > > signal based on the fact that an "object" was specified > > is confusing - it also rules out the use case of specifying > > a signal that is not swapped & has an object user_data. > > Back in the GTK+ 1.x days I think gtk_signal_connect_object() used to > automatically swap the callback arguments. There wasn't any "swap" > option. > > So calling it "one of the most obvious mistakes" is a bit harsh! >
I'm sorry Damon I wasn't aware of that history, I just remembered you being annoyed about this glitch on the ML one day so I assume we can agree that its confusing functionality, dont know why I assumed it was a mistake. Cheers, -Tristan _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list