Am Montag, den 18.06.2007, 19:08 -0600 schrieb Elijah Newren: > On 6/18/07, Hubert Figuiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't agree with that one. It is much simplier to add a C++ compile > > test. Afterall, which platform does not have a C++ compiler? Why > > reinventing the wheel yet again to make it square? > > Do all embedded platforms have a C++ compiler? And are there really > that many C++-specific keywords?
You are missing the point. This test would be run by "make check" to prevent that the maintainer releases code having C++ keywords in its headers. Regular users would not be affected by this test. Created a Bugzilla ticket: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449016 Potential implementation of the test: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=90258 Ciao, Mathias PS: Pardon for spaming, but seems like Evolution enjoys it to randomly choose my sender address. The taschenorakel address is not subscribed to gtk-devel list. -- Mathias Hasselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://taschenorakel.de/
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
