Hi Matthias, Matthias Clasen schrieb: > On 11/1/07, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't have much in terms of comments. My general reaction to > grandiose test frameworks is that fixtures, setup/teardown, > hierarchical test suites are too much overhead for me. Maybe this > approach to testing works for people who are move > disciplined than me, I prefer the simple-minded make check approach... > > One thing I find pretty useful, that has not been mentioned so far (or > I missed it) is regression tests for bugs. For these it is very useful > to have some standardized way to refer to the bug they are testing.
I added a test suite to gtk-doc recently. Basically its just two sample projects, where one is demontration how to use it (positive tests) and the 2nd has the regression tests. For the 2nd one I basically have dummy code where symbol names refer to bugnumbers like: /** * bug_26354: * ... */ void bug_26354(const gchar* const str) { } Nothing prevents you to have a test suite for regressions where you encode the bugnumber into the testcase name. Stefan _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list