I notice there's a large table of compose sequences in
gtkimcontextsimple.c. Is there any particular logic to the exact
sequences listed here, or would it be acceptable to add some more?

I'd quite like to have some mappings of Esperanto characters added;
namely:

GDK_dead_circumflex, GDK_C, 0, 0, 0, 0x0108, /* 
LATIN_CAPITAL_LETTER_C_WITH_CIRCUMFLEX */
GDK_dead_circumflex, GDK_G, 0, 0, 0, 0x011D, /* 
LATIN_CAPITAL_LETTER_G_WITH_CIRCUMFLEX */
GDK_dead_circumflex, GDK_H, 0, 0, 0, 0x0124, /* 
LATIN_CAPITAL_LETTER_H_WITH_CIRCUMFLEX */
GDK_dead_circumflex, GDK_J, 0, 0, 0, 0x0134, /* 
LATIN_CAPITAL_LETTER_J_WITH_CIRCUMFLEX */
GDK_dead_circumflex, GDK_S, 0, 0, 0, 0x015C, /* 
LATIN_CAPITAL_LETTER_S_WITH_CIRCUMFLEX */

GDK_dead_circumflex, GDK_c, 0, 0, 0, 0x0109, /* 
LATIN_SMALL_LETTER_C_WITH_CIRCUMFLEX */
GDK_dead_circumflex, GDK_g, 0, 0, 0, 0x011D, /* 
LATIN_SMALL_LETTER_G_WITH_CIRCUMFLEX */
GDK_dead_circumflex, GDK_h, 0, 0, 0, 0x0125, /* 
LATIN_SMALL_LETTER_H_WITH_CIRCUMFLEX */
GDK_dead_circumflex, GDK_j, 0, 0, 0, 0x0135, /* 
LATIN_SMALL_LETTER_J_WITH_CIRCUMFLEX */
GDK_dead_circumflex, GDK_s, 0, 0, 0, 0x015D, /* 
LATIN_SMALL_LETTER_S_WITH_CIRCUMFLEX */

GDK_dead_caron,      GDK_U, 0, 0, 0, 0x01D3, /* 
LATIN_CAPITAL_LETTER_U_WITH_CARON */

GDK_dead_caron,      GDK_u, 0, 0, 0, 0x01D4, /* LATIN_SMALL_LETTER_U_WITH_CARON 
*/

Should I submit a patch?

-- 
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 4135350       |  Registered Linux# 179460
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Reply via email to