Martyn Russell wrote: > Hi all, > > I will be posting my final review of the gtk.org pages in the coming few > weeks and I wanted people's opinions on a few things. > > 1. Would anyone object to putting the Windows binaries on the gtk.org > site instead of Tor's site? It makes sense to me to have it there. Tor, > any input here?
Excellent idea. > 2. With regards to the FAQ, is there a burning need to have this in a > docbook format? Currently it is a mess and I am thinking of reforming > it, but before I do, I wonder if we should just put it completely in > HTML and as part of the website. Is there any need for us to put it in > PDF or any other format, really? How about it be placed in a wiki? > 3. Do we really need a gtk 1.2 FAQ? If not, I will remove the cruft from > the FAQ that is no longer pertinent. No, and if someone wanted a GTK+ 1.2 FAQ, they could always get it off the FTP site inside the source tar file. ;-) -Shawn _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
