Am Donnerstag, den 13.12.2007, 17:31 +0100 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
>
> typedef enum {
>   G_FILE_QUERY_INFO_FLAGS_NONE = 0,
>   G_FILE_QUERY_INFO_NOFOLLOW_SYMLINKS = (1<<0) 
> }
> 
> vs
> 
> typedef enum  {
>   G_FILE_MONITOR_FLAGS_NONE = 0,
>   G_FILE_MONITOR_FLAGS_MONITOR_MOUNTS = (1<<0)
> } GFileMonitorFlags;
> 
> What do people think is the best approach here?

To my knowledge GTK+ would call them:

typedef enum { /*< flags >*/
  G_FILE_QUERY_INFO_NONE = 0,
  G_FILE_QUERY_INFO_NOFOLLOW_SYMLINKS = (1<<0) 
} GFileQueryInfoFlags;

and

typedef enum { /*< flags >*/
  G_FILE_MONITOR_NONE = 0,
  G_FILE_MONITOR_MONITOR_MOUNTS = (1<<0)
} GFileMonitorFlags;

A problem is the doublicate "monitor", so the second value should be
something like:

  G_FILE_MONITOR_WATCH_MOUNTS


Ciao,
Mathias
-- 
Mathias Hasselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://taschenorakel.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Reply via email to