On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:41 +0000, Martyn Russell wrote: > Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > >> And I still believe that the official GNOME bindings deserve to be in > >> a > >> separate section. > > > > I see that the site is live already. Please don't just ignore this > > regression. I've mentioned it before too. > > Hi Murray, > > We are not ignoring it, it is a planned change. There are one or two and > we have had quite a few improvement requests since going live - we will > be getting to it soon. > > Currently I am contemplating: > > 1. Removing the whole table and linking to the GNOME bindings page > instead which I think jdahlin suggest to me. > > 2. Removing anything older than (including) 2.8 which is no longer > supported I think. If we do this then there is little point in having > half the languages on there since the data we have shows most are only > partially supported up to 2.4.
But the data we have is probably out-of-date and will never be regularly up-to-date. If you just remove them then there's no easy way for people to find them. The original page had text about how the information is self-reported and therefore not that reliable. > Currently the bindings link is broken since it has changed since > starting the pages. I guess we should link to > > http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyone/Bindings That's really just for release management. I don't think it would be wise to make that the only list of our supported bindings. The existing page worked fairly well. > This link will have to be kept up to date, if this is the link to use, > it would be better to have a more permanent link that doesn't change > with new versions of GNOME (which we used to have). Theoretically, http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable/Bindings should do that but it doesn't seem to work for sub-pages. > 3. Putting the language bindings on a separate page (if we keep the > table of course). > > This any a bunch of other things we have had requested will be processed > in due course :) OK. Thanks. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list