[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sorry to revive this again, but does anyone have a link to the > discussion of this? My google search is failing me. > > It seems strange to me that GTK goes to a lot of trouble to support > accessibility (atk and friends), but then has a homepage which breaks > W3C accessibility guidelines. Other than this issue I really like the > redesign, congrats to all who worked on it.
Would not a fixed-width design meet accessibility guidelines and work on small, mobile screens if it used a fixed width based on ems instead of pixels? Seems to me the time of using pixels for layouts is as obsolete as GTK using pixel layouts for buttons and other ui elements. Many fixed-width schemes these days actually now are in ems, so they look correct when the font size is changed or the client screen DPI is higher or lower. For example: http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200504/about_fluid_and_fixed_width_layouts/ > > John > _______________________________________________ > gtk-devel-list mailing list > gtk-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list > -- Michael Torrie Assistant CSR, System Administrator Chemistry and Biochemistry Department Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602 +1.801.422.5771 _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
