Yevgen Muntyan wrote: > Alexander Shaduri wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Having studied the FSF licenses and their restrictions, I think >> it would be reasonable to re-license GTK+ under the LGPLv3 >> (or later) + GPLv2 linking exception (or, alternatively, simply >> multi-license it under LGPLv3 / GPLv2). >> > > But you can't do that. Gtk is *LGPL*-2, so you can't > make it GPL-2 (unless you convince all contributors, > including aliens and dead).
Yes, you can. Quoth the LGPLv2.1: "You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library. [...] (If a newer version than version 2 of the ordinary GNU General Public License has appeared, then you can specify that version instead if you wish.)" Personally I think this clause is kinda ridiculous, but it's there, nonetheless. Any LGPLv#-covered program can be relicensed as a GPLv#-or-later program as well. Interestingly, my reading of this shows that, even if you license under "LGPLv2.1-only", someone can relicense as GPLv2-or-later, or GPLv3-or-later, or even GPLv3-only. -brian _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list