On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 10:55 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 07:43 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote: > > > If you get an Inferior leave, you may be losing the ability to track the > > pointer at that point ... the pointer may have disappeared deep into a > > descendant of some foreign child. So I don't see how you can just ignore > > it - it's going to need to be translated into one or more GDK leave and > > enter events. (Depending on the current sprite window tracked by GDK and > > the subwindow field.) > > > > Same for Inferior enters, and in fact virtual enters/leaves as well. > > Hmm, this is a bit of a problem. How do you tell the difference from a > virtual leave to an inferior with subwindow NULL to a virtual leave to a > parent (which also sets subwindow to NULL).
Actually, I think the book i have is not correct. This can't happen, right? Because in the second case we'd have an virtual enter with parent NULL. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list