2009/2/11 Matthias Clasen <matthias.cla...@gmail.com>: > With 2.20 winding down, I think now would be a good time to talk about > what should happen in Glib 2.22. > > One thing that has been tossed around for a long time is that it would > be really good to have DBus support on the Glib level.
Would this support be optional? I'm concerned about making GLib dependant on a dbus development environment on Windows as DBus has no regular windows builds whatsoever (AFAIK). > This would allow us to move forward with several things in GTK+ that > will work much better if they can use DBus: > - session support > - unique application support Would DBus be swappable here for something else on non freedesktop environments? (Windows, Mac) > Let me list some, with possible answers: -- Cheers, Alberto Ruiz _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
