Yes. The most common example I can think of is when a function is deprecated.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Eugene Gorodinsky <e.gorodin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Have there been cases where documentation for some function was > changed after that function appeared in the stable version? > > 2009/2/19 Dominic Lachowicz <domlachow...@gmail.com>: >> That's hard-ish to do today. GTK+'s documentation is generated in >> large part by scanning comments in C code, which a program then turns >> into HTML. Any proposal would require a way to keep the Wiki and the C >> comments in-sync. >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Eugene Gorodinsky >> <e.gorodin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> Since you guys are discussing the redesign of the gtk+ website, I'd >>> like to propose an idea that I have. I've seen quite a lot of comments >>> saying gtk+ documentation isn't as good as qt's. What do you think of >>> having a wiki that documents all of gtk+ api? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gtk-devel-list mailing list >>> gtk-devel-list@gnome.org >>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Counting bodies like sheep to the rhythm of the war drums. >> > -- Counting bodies like sheep to the rhythm of the war drums. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list