On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 20:30 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 10:36 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > > I'd also welcome if GCancellable and GInitable could be moved to > > > GObject. They are potentially useful outside GIO. > > > > Why can't you not use them from GIO? GIO is a general library that has > > the same availability as gobject (ship in same tarball) and no > > significant extra cost (gtk+ links to it anyway). > > It doesn't matter on the desktop of course. But for embedded devices GIO > is often not useful. Still GCancellable and GInitable would be > potentially useful. And both class feel semantically closer to GObject > than to GIO.
I don't necessarily disagree, but I'm not sure it is ABI compatible to move a symbol between libraries like that. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list