On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 23:38 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > its hard for me to see anything other than > > active/inactive > sensitive/insensitive > > that are required to be mutually exclusive. its only "paired states" > that require this kind of thing, and if we have 2 of them already, > thats probably just about enough. am i missing something?
What would be special about those pairs? Other states could be seen as pairs, too: focused/unfocused default/not default ... So all just boolean, actually. I thought the issue was that currently states that shouldn't be mutually exclusive are. However, insensitive is special, as it makes everything else meaningless. -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
