On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 11:43 +0100, Christian Dywan wrote: > > However, in this particular case if we had the plugin system cache i > > wouldn't mind having a basic uncompression GConverter that used magic > > sniffing and modules for extending to new forms of compression. > > I have to wonder how significant the overhead can be, if you consider > the huge amount of modules in GVfs which come in one big package. ;)
Most apps use those, so its a bit different. However, you're right that there is already a lot of modules. Modules are not loaded to the global namespace so are less problematic than direct linking, but its still got a startup cost. So, getting a module cache would be really nice. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list