* Martyn Russell <mar...@lanedo.com> schrieb: > On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 09:54 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:16, Matthias Clasen > > > That may be, but 'disable this random set of widgets I don't need' > > > patches have very little chance of going upstream. > > > > Why do they have little chance of going upstream? > > The maintenance overhead is just not worth it and that's most likely the > reason. When projects get to the size of GTK+ you really notice this > overhead.
The big question to me is, why has it grown to this size in the first place ? Why can't those things simply be in their own libs, ontop of gtk ? cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weig...@metux.de mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list