On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Martyn Russell <mar...@lanedo.com> wrote:
> On 07/06/11 16:02, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > >> On 2011-06-07 at 14:48, Martyn Russell wrote: >> >>> Ideally, we would upgrade the server's php version to 5.2 and enable >>> the json apache module if possible. >>> >> >> Ideally, shouldn't we move gtk.org under the Gnome infrastructure >> instead? at least it would be under the scope of the Gnome sysadmin team >> and we wouldn't need to keep two infrastructures in sync. >> >> we should probably have both gtk.org and gtk.gnome.org as well. >> > > I would like that too, but in retrospect, I found out that Tim Janik > (ironically) has root access to the machine too - so it's less of an issue > now. A few people have root, with the intent that if I become unreachable, there are others that can help out. (For example, if I go on vacation, which is where I was the past few days...) > > I have no idea what's required to make this happen, I suspect moving dns > entries and creating a project in the gnomeweb-wml git repo? > Moving gtk.org would also require moving gimp.org and maintaining that as well. It would involve not only the website but also FTP, mail, DNS, etc. It is a package deal. And I'd probably have to keep root access in the process... would the GNOME sysadmin team want another sysadmin? > Does anyone have information about the political reasons as to why it was > never moved before? I am missing the history on that. > > We should probably only talk about 10+ year old history like that over beer. :) It's a different mix of people now, so I'm sure we can create our own political problems if we need to. :) -Shawn -- Shawn T. Amundson
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
