On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:58 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote: > TBH, I don't think the name alone will prevent misuse; in particular > so as the "glib" prefix is no obvious internal-only hint (e.g. > glib_check_version() is not private either). > > Wouldn't a note in the API docs suffice?
We have a few functions like glib_gettext() that are glib internal API (enforced by not being defined in an installed header). I envision this falling into the same category. Cheers _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list