On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 17:30 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > I mostly agree with that. It certainly means nobody is validating > these files at build/install time.
I am, but not against any DTD: http://www.murrayc.com/blog/permalink/2010/03/30/testing-glade-files/ though I would like to use a DTD. > The question is, "should they?" I would like to do any testing that I can, particularly if it's easy. > People don't usually put that stuff in their Makefiles unless you > make it easy for them. It comes down to whether there's a high rate > of invalid .ui files being installed. It happens sometimes, and it usually causes crashes. It's nice to avoid it even if it's rare. > I kind of suspect no, because > they're almost always machine-generated. With menu files written > (for now) by hand, that might be different. Glade has been a little funky over the last few years, so hand-editing has often been necessary. > Of course, having an invalid DTD in the docs (and another one for > GtkUIManager, incidentally) isn't good. If nobody cares about the > DTD per se, maybe we should look at less 1980s ways of conveying > the grammar. -- murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list