On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 12:53 +0100, Dieter Verfaillie wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:44:53 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 15:19 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote: > >> The -win32 branch is now in a pretty good state and seems to be the > >> best > >> Gtk 2.x version for win32 so far, so I just merged it into gtk-2-24, > >> and > >> I plan to do a release later this week. > > [snip] > > > > Many thanks for that. > > > > What's happening with win32 support in GTK+ 3? Do you have any idea > > when > > there will be binaries available, even for testing? I'd like to > > update > > Glom's Windows installer. > > I maintain http://www.optionexplicit.be/projects/gnome-windows/GTK+3/ > which is built from ATK, Pango, GLib, GTK+, GObject-Introspection, etc > master branches. For some modules with highly experimental patches that > have not yet been accepted "upstream" even. [snip]
Thanks, but are people generally working on getting the GTK+ 2 Windows improvements into GTK+ 3? I'd like a general sense of how it is going. I want to use it, but I don't want to spend more time with Windows than necessary if I can avoid it. -- murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list