On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Hubert Figuière <hfigui...@teaser.fr>wrote:
> On 17/07/12 03:46 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > > it can be very hard. there are two approaches. one is to build a > > pseudo/fake gtk-doc package for OS X, which does actually exist, but i > > can't tell you where to find it. google will help. the other is to > install > > ALL the dependencies that gtk-doc requires, which is substantial: > > And do we know the rationale for forcing gtk-doc ? I mean glib is > supposed to be lightweight library, but this is like everything > including the kitchen sink. This alone as always discouraged me to use > glib for portable code. > i should note that the list above is the order i actually build things in on OS X. you will note that glib gets built without gtk-doc, with no special magic. a lot of that stack is there for gtk, not glib, and i think i'm probably wrong to say that its needed for gtk-doc.
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
