hi,
On 12-11-11 03:03 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hard to disagree in the abstract. But also not much of a discussion unless
you cite the specific examples that made you write this mail.
Which changes were problematic ?
There are three specific cases that come to mind:
1) Recently Martin asked me for permission to backport his boxing of
GPollFD to the stable branch of GLib and I said "no new API on stable
branches". I mention this only because of how small of a change it
would have been compared to the following two:
2) The icon view changes that landed in the 3.4 cycle.
3) The file chooser "recent folder" changes that landed in 3.0 and also
on 2.x.
I consider the last case to be particularly egregious because nothing
was broken to start with and the changes were highly visible from a UI
standpoint. As I understand it, GNOME enters UI freeze at a particular
point in time and never leaves it (on a given stable release). We can
argue that Gtk is not GNOME, of course...
My main reason for raising these concerns is that I want to see GLib and
Gtk stable releases picked up by the distributions for the valuable
bugfixes that they contain but distributions (Ubuntu, specifically) are
getting annoyed with the non-bugfix changes that are often appearing in
our stable series...
Cheers
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list