Hi >> There is one entree in Bugzilla about g_ptr_array_set_size () from 2007. > > You mean this? https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422939 > > Not really relevant.
Correct, not relevant at all .. but this all I could find .. hence my e-mail to this list to ask for the proper place to look. You told me that this gint/guint is probably an oversight and that is all we need to know. Case close as far as I'm concern. >> Well we get rid of useless friction and also it normalize the interface. >> Agree that 2^31 is plenty but for my use case, g_ptr_array it is the >> fastest. >> Rather then returning to the user a pointer to an internal object in my >> lib >> I return an index to a g_ptr_array of internal pointer .. it's safer - no >> risk of dangling pointer for instance. > > I agree that it would make the API more pleasing, but I don't think we > can justify the API break. Sorry! OK no problem .. maybe push this in glib 3.0 ! I'm just a random internet guy. So let me know if I need to do something else. As I said, this thread document the gint/guint of g_ptr_array and I think ours job is done! Thanks again Philip, Sylvain. > > Philip > _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
