On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Jasper St. Pierre <jstpie...@mecheye.net> wrote:
> Are you sure? This shouldn't be the case since > > > https://github.com/anholt/libepoxy/commit/e3051481cc9f5b7b36b317aff1454ee16ea9cdb9 > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:54 PM, John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote: > >> It looks like we've committed to using libepoxy[1] as a shim for GL >> support. It looks quite nice, but there's a catch: In spite of the claim in >> our INSTALL that it's cross-platform, it actually depends on X11. >> >> I think that means that we need to have a separate GL interface >> per-backend. >> > Jasper's correct; I tried this out a while ago [1] and it currently does the right thing in modulesets-unstable [2], although the repository I specified there pointed to the libepoxy commit _before_ it was merged to master. This isn't yet in any release, I suppose we need to wait for libepoxy 1.3. [1] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2014-November/msg00012.html [2] https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk-osx/tree/modulesets-unstable/gtk-osx.modules#n85 Best, -- Philip
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
