2015-10-15 3:16 GMT+08:00 Matthias Clasen <matthias.cla...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Nicolas Dufresne > <nicolas.dufre...@collabora.com> wrote: >> >> Le lundi 12 octobre 2015 à 23:24 +0800, cee1 a écrit : >> >> > >> > 2. I notice EFL use some "COW" logic[1], but we already have a much >> > clean implementation in GStreamer, that's >> > gst_mini_object_make_writable[2]. Then we may merge GstMiniObject >> > back >> > to glib? >> >> We (taking my GStreamer hat) havent heard of any interest from the GLib >> group for lightweight objects. Note that some library ended up also >> having these lightweight kind of object, hence may be interesting to >> eventually consolidate. > > > I think it is fair to say that there is more interest in fixing performance > of GObject than there is in introducing a miniobject type. Not sure if that > qualifies as 'interest in lightweight objects' or not. > I dimly remember there was a branch for GObject performance tuning?
-- Regards, - cee1 _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list