My personal opinion is that it's a good move, even though it'll create some pain. Since the API itself won't change behavior-wise, adapting the code to the new change will be simple enough (a Search and Replace throughout the codebase will be enough, I think).
Em qui, 20 de out de 2016 às 09:22, Sébastien Wilmet <swil...@gnome.org> escreveu: > Hi, > > For GtkSourceView 3.90, there is a plan to rename the namespace from > GtkSource to Gsv: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755752 > > Because the current namespace (GtkSource, or gtk_source in lowercase) > conflicts with the GTK+ one. > > But I have never heard complaints from GTK+ developers. > > So the question is: does it worth the big API churn? Or do you think it > is OK to continue using the GtkSource namespace? > > Another element to take into account: GtkSourceView doesn't show the > good example, although it is a widespread library, so external > developers might create other libraries that also conflict with the Gtk > namespace. Example: GtkSpell. > > PS: it is not me who created GtkSourceView, I started contributing much > later, so the namespace conflict isn't my fault, I prefer to clarify. > > -- > Sébastien > _______________________________________________ > gtk-devel-list mailing list > gtk-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list >
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
