On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 15:44, Christian Biere wrote: > The configuration panel should not be changed back to a sub-notebook > without investigation about the compiling problems. That's what I wanted > to pass through.
Absolutely. IIRC, at the time I had to basically split the tab panes into their own windows under glade to prevent gtkg from crashing the compiler (and starving the OS). Please don't undo thoses changes without trying a few compiles first :)) Cheers, ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 15:44, Christian Biere wrote: > Russell Francis wrote: > > Christian Biere wrote: > > > what's up with your memory? Using a sub-notebook with Glade for GTK+ 2.x > > > made GTKG uncompileable. 10 min. and more for interface-glade2.c... > > > I just pulled CVS and compiled GTK2, can't say any of that sounds > > familiar? It took less than 10 minutes to compile all of GtkG on a P3? > > I was referring to the situation in the past and the one in the likely > future. The present situation is not a problem. The mail was also a > reaction to a second information path. So I obviously confused readers > of the mail which wasn't my attention. > The configuration panel should not be changed back to a sub-notebook > without investigation about the compiling problems. That's what I wanted > to pass through.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
