Quoting Thomas Schuerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from ml.softs.gtk-gnutella.devel: :someone on gdf complained that HSEP has not been discussed on gdf but :was implemented into GTKG: : :http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_gdf/message/19257 : :Raphael and I wrote a reply to this. Of course, I have always wanted :to gather feedback and offered cooperation in modifying the proposal :if necessary. But again, no further comments on this were posted by :now, neither by the one who complained nor by others.
This may mean that nobody really cares. The spike of interest probably arose just because of some curiosity, but now that people know what HSEP is, they don't care much about implementing it. But you know, when I first proposed (and implemented) Gnet traffic compression, there was no interest either. Two years later, every major servent supports it. I proposed PARQ (and Jeroen implemented it), and although to date it's only done in GTKG, queuing is supported by every major servent as well. Although only GTKG peers benefit from the queue callbacks, but that's an edge we have over the competition, so it's actually good for GTKG! HSEP is different in the sense that it will bring benetits only when widely implemented. So we have a problem in the sense that when nobody but GTKG supports it, there is little incentive for anyone to implement it as the rewards won't be immediate. Raphael ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
