Christian Biere wrote: > I haven't yet tried with GCC 3.4 but maybe the patch doesn't fix the > problem.
I've tried GCC 3.4 and it didn't show warnings in all cases. > If it doesn't fix it, try removing "inline" from the prototype > of "update_row". This could be related to a change in the way inline > is handled by GCC. Maybe it doesn't generate any code at all for it > because it's nowhere directly used so that the address of the function > is undefined. This seems to be the problem, indeed. I've ran it with gdb, it crashed and gdb got an internal error because it was highly surprised that the function wasn't in some of the object tables. The problem should be fixed in CVS now. -- Christian
pgptJ2GE4C37C.pgp
Description: PGP signature
