Hi,
On Monday 05 July 2004 20:30, Christian Biere wrote:
> Martin Preuss wrote:
> > just a question: Is it possible that current versions of GTKG use
> > considerable more memory than previous versions (about 1/4 or 1/2 year
> > ago) did ?
>
> This is difficult to answer or to investigate because you don't tell
> which frontend or mode you use and how long it takes until GTKG uses
> a lot of memory. The memory usage depends on *a lot* of factors e.g.,
> number of downloads, uploads, shared files, entries in
> ~/.gtk-gnutella/{parq,downloads,fileinfo} etc. From my perspective
> GTKG (at least in leaf mode) seems to use a little less memory
> currently. You could try compiling with -DTRACK_ZALLOC to check whether
> there are any significant memory leaks detected.
I guess it has to do with the memory leak issue currently under discussion in
another thread.
After about 18 days of continuous operation GTKG (gtk1) has accumulated about
80 mb virtual memory. However, after a restart it uses *far* less memory and
the system is responsive again.
Currently (after 1d 01:39) it uses about 20 mb virtual memory again, so I
guess in three days I have to restart it again.
I was just asking because this behaviour is new (well, those problems were the
reasons for me not to cvs-update too often, because once I found a version
which has nearly no problems it is hard for me to update ;-)
The version I used before (with the "beep" feature ;-) used to run for weeks
without any problem...
kind regards
Martin
--
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
