Quoting Christian Biere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from ml.softs.gtk-gnutella.devel: :This alone is sufficient to give GLib the kiss of death. If gsize is :not the equivalent of size_t, the whole library is broken. This :gint, glong, gsize non-sense is pissing me off to no extent anyway.
I can understand the need for "gsize" or "gint32", when portability is concerned. Maybe gint and glong are here only to be in friendly company... It would be strange to use "int" at places and "gint32" at others? I'd rather use "int32" then if we ditch "gint". Raphael ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
