On 26 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Bill Pringlemeir wrote: >> (gdb) bt >>> 0 0x0811bdf3 in pcache_outgoing_connection (n=0xd594444) at >>> override.h:78 1 0x080fc20e in node_is_now_connected (n=0xd594444) >>> at nodes.c:3213
> It would be interesting to see the details of "n". So far I don't > see how the assertion could trigger. Arrgh. I thought that I had saved the core file for this case that went with my latest binary. That didn't happen. I also remember I had a case without a core file. I think that a break point instructions was hit. >> Any requests for stupid user tricks? Recompile with dmalloc? > By the way, GCC 4.1 has finally offical support for the stack > protector. Although I don't think any of the issues mentioned > recently are stack-related, it can't hurt to take advantage of it. All of my builds are with GCC 3.4.3 and they have the IBM stack protector patch. This patch actually generates quite a bit of extra code from what I have seen... but I do have it enabled. fwiw, Bill Pringlemeir. ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
