On 26 Nov 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> UPnP : ??? (no)
> NIH.
>> NAT traversal : ??? (no)
>> NAT port mapping : ??? (no)
> Only the usual UDP hole punching.
>> F2F[2] : ??? fire wall to fire wall???
At first, I thought this was sort of lame. All four items are related
to the ability to accept connections. I guess this is important for
GNET as it is one of the few protocols without centralized servers, so
the average user must allow connections if they want to be an ultra.
Also, it seems very trivial to setup your network to allow
connections. However, given the technical abilities of the average
Windows user, I can see why these are emphasised. There is a open
source libupnp; but the quality seems lacking.
>> Other : passive search, hsep, filtering?
> HSEP is only supported by gtk-gnutella. gtk-gnutella filters liked
> mad.
Someone already put TLS and IpV6. Another is bitzi. I notice that
gtkg is not mentioned on the bitzi page ("http://bitzi.com/";).
Bearshare, limewire, shareaza, xolox, mldonkey, phex, trusty files,
aquisition, mutella, and morpheus are there. Is there a gtkg gif
(88x31) that could be sent to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Or do they want more
than magnet links and bitzi queries?
Regards,
Bill Pringlemeir.
gtk-gnutella.png
Description: I have no artist talent
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
