Matthew Lye wrote:
> On 16-Aug-07, at 10:28 PM, Christian Biere wrote:
> 
> > That's odd. Could you show me the output of the following? I suspect
> > that your GCC might not like the combination of -E with some other
> > compiler flags. Otherwise I don't see why it does not detect GCC 4.x.
> 
> The output is:
> 
> > [22:30:23|~>~/Desktop/cbstest.sh
> > gcc_version_major 4
> > gcc_version_minor 4
> > gcc_version_patchlevel 1

Ok, thanks, so the test works in general. I've removed $ccflags from
the line. Maybe your GCC front-end doesn't like the mix of -E and -fast
or something. Does it pick -O2 now?
 
> > Do you really have to pass --make=/usr/bin/make?
 
> Yes, I really do.  Really a very odd thing.  Um...
> my sh might  really be bash, not the original sh.  That's all I can think of.
> But  that's less than rare, right?

I think the original died long ago in a tape accident but Bash is rather 
epidemic,
yes.

> > Locating common programs...
> > I don't know where 'make' is, and my life depends on it.
> > Go find a free implementation or fix your PATH setting!

Is /usr/bin not in your PATH? Could you show me the output of the two commands 
below?

which gmake
which make

-- 
Christian

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel

Reply via email to