On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:41:06PM +0200, Christian Biere wrote: > > Seems a little heavy handed. I think it's preferable things pull when > > they see rather than seeking out everything that is out of data. > > I'm not sure what you mean. I wasn't saying the peers themselves should > crawl. A > dedicated crawler, just like GhostWhiteCrab, would do that and everytime it > comes > across some gtk-gnutella peer,
can it be pushed? Is there some way to disguise the message as a request? GTKG_BLACKLIST_VER 9 8 7 6 5 leaves would need to set the QRP bits for all 10 digits and the string GTKGNODES_BLACKLIST_VER to be sure they'd get the request... how about pull? a magic request that evokes a resopnse from each gtkg node with the latest version of the list. possibly the filename (or xml?) in the response could include a signature of the sha1 to make it harder to forge responses? Bye. Jasen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
