On Mon, 05 Mar 2001 14:10:29 EST, Havoc Pennington said:
> Right. Adding something like a GTK_ALLOW_INSECURE environment variable
> doesn't seem like a terrible idea, though it's too late to do so for
> 1.2.9.
Wrong.
A hacker can just say 'export GTK_ALLOW_INSECURE' and then run his exploit.
A better solution would be to have a global variable inside the GTK libs
that the application itself could set if it was willing to take the risks.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Owen Taylor
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Paul Davis
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Owen Taylor
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Stephen Witkop
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Paul Davis
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Havoc Pennington
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Havoc Pennington
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Havoc Pennington
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Havoc Pennington
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Nils Philippsen
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Paul Davis
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released David Ford
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Kevin Handy
PGP signature